I usually don’t like to jump on the bandwagon and rush to my computer to write a post about overly hyped current events. But, I genuinely had a major thought-provoking reaction to the news that when Facebook announced the launch of Places, Foursquare had a record number of new users sign up the next day.
It surprised me, mainly because I did not even consider it. Not really all that shocking when I do think about it, but still really neat. After all, publicity is publicity. And this was the mother of all publicity. A Huge social media company is announcing (in a live stream no-less) that they are going to be competing with a smaller company that is just picking up speed. I mean, really, how does this make the average worker or small business person feel? Are you rooting for the little guy? Do you love the under-dog? Will it be necessary to choose one or the other – or will you use both services?
If you do have to choose who will you choose? The front-runner or the under-dog? Everyone loves a success story of the “little guy” beating the “giant”. But what does this sharing of the spotlight between Foursquare and Facebook say about our current business culture? Is there really room for both? Can both be extremely successful? Can there be a deep, symbiotic relationship where both the little and the big guy have value and depend on each other equally? Is Facebook doing this to avoid a PR nightmare of appearing to be the Big Box of social media that squashes all the Mom and Pop’s of the world?
Regardless of the cause and effect of the “Facebook + Foursquare = Social Zen” story, my recent observations are that business is indeed changing. It is becoming more social. It is becoming more balanced. My generation and the one before it and certainly the one after it are really trying to correct the errors we feel our parents made. We are recognizing that the phrase “business is business” is out-dated and absurd. We feel that business is people and relationships and without these relationships a business is doomed in this new social world. Everyone is sharing and eventually, if you are a predator who stabs people in the back, you will lose respect, you will lose customers, and you will lose money – and maybe you will lose your entire business.
It’s not just business collaborations but also client relationships that are changing quickly. We are beginning to take note that the same thing that applies in social circles applies in business circles. If you work with a known jerk – you may be perceived as a jerk or you condone other people being jerks. We are choosing our clients as selectively as we choose our associates. A prime example comes from the following tweet by @bradgosse.
I adore the fact that Brad is unwilling to do work for someone who is abusive to his staff! Will this cost him some immediate revenue? Absolutely! Will it gain him a long-term reputation as someone who is willing to stand up against atrocities – for sure! In the end he will gain a reputation of refusing to be a sell-out and maintaining a stance for what he believes in, no matter what the monetary outcome is. By clearly displaying that money is not his motivator he gains trust, and where there is trust there is more business opportunities.
How can this be applied to your business structure? Is there a “big box” in your industry that could really help you along in a mutually beneficial relationship? Is there a “whale” of a client that you need to fire before they ruin your reputation?
Be aware old dogs, if you still think “it’s just business – it’s not personal” you might be in for a big surprise as this social movement continues to gain strength and momentum.








“I Disagree with You.” vs. “You Are an Idiot!”
August 5th, 2010Use the Comments Field to Encourage Useful Dialogue (not to attack the writer)
Have you ever read the comments on your blog and found that it appears the person was reading something else when they commented? A completely different understanding of the point you were trying to make, or they read into it more than what you wrote?
I have! Words have been inserted into my mouth (or in this case keyboard). It appears when a commenter is struggling to make their point they insert anything they need to help their case. This kills the discussion. No one needs to be attacked for what they did not say – isn’t there enough attacking going on based on what they did say?
Here are my tips (not rules, I am not the Internet police) for playing nice on the playground. You won’t get a time-out if you don’t play nice, but you will quickly become the kid who has no one to play with.
Did I miss any? What comments have you received that have ended a conversation abruptly?
*Didn’t anyone tell you that you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar? It’s true. If you are trying to make a point and you tell someone they are an idiot, they quit listening to you right then. You’d be better off putting yourself on mute, at least then they might try to read your lips.